-Mother Teresa
Today (Wednesday) at noon there is going to be a presentation at the med school on first and second trimester abortions. I did some research on the presenter tonight, and found his testimony from 2004 when he testified on behalf of Planned Parenthood in their attempt to overturn the ban on partial birth abortions. (Planned Parenthood vs. Ashcroft, April 6, 2004.) (Warning: it's graphic.)
Excerpts from Government's cross-examination:
DAY FIVE: Tuesday, April 6, 2004
Q. Now, you have encountered situations in which you are performing a D&E and the fetus is removed intact except that the head of the fetus gets stuck at the internal cervical os, correct?
A. Correct.
Q. When that has happened you have preceeded with the D&E procedure in one of three ways, correct?
A. If you can tell me the three ways I would be happy to.
Q. One method would be to pull on the baby so that the head breaks off from the rest of the body; is that right?
A. Yes.
Q. And then, you will go inside the uterus with the forceps and remove the head?
A. Correct.
Q. The next method is that you would use scissors to puncture the base of the skull?
A. Correct.
Q. And then, you will stick a suction cannula into the opening and drain the brain tissue, and then you will have the head come out.
A. Did you say "Drain the brain tissue"?
Q. Then, you will drain the brain tissue?
A. Yes.
~
Q. And the third method is that you take a crushing instrument, put that instrument inside the cervical os, crush the baby's head, and pull the head through the cervix, correct?
A. That would be the third possible, although physically that would virtually never be the case. It
would be one of the first two. Those are my three options, but it would be one of the first two that I could realistically do.
~
Q. Doctor, if a woman's cervix was so dilated the fetus could be delivered in intact it would not be necessary to collapse the skull because the fetus could pass through the cervix, right?
A. Correct.
Q. But you would not allow the fetus to pass intact if the fetus were at or about 24 weeks in gestation, correct?
A. Correct.
Q. Because if the fetus were close to 24 weeks, and you were performing a transvaginal surgical abortion you would be concerned about delivering the fetus entirely intact because that might result in a live baby that may survive, correct?
A. You said I was performing an abortion, so since the objective of the abortion is to not have a live fetus, then that would be correct.
Q. In your opinion, if you were performing a surgical abortion at 23 or 24 weeks and the cervix was so dilated that the head could pass without compression, you would do whatever you needed to do in order to make sure that the live baby was not delivered, wouldn't you?
A. Whatever I needed, meaning whatever surgical procedures I needed to do as part of the procedure? Yes. Then, the answer would be: Yes.
Q. And one step you would take to avoid delivery of a live baby would to be to deliver or hold the fetus' head on the internal side of the cervical os in order to collapse the skull; is that right?
A. Yes, because the objective of my procedure is to perform an abortion.
Q. And that would ensure that you did not deliver a live baby?
A. Correct.
We have good reason to hope and to pray for conversion...
"A number of abortionists have converted to pro-life activism since the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion. The most famous such convert is Dr. Bernard Nathanson, co-founder of the abortion lobby NARAL. Nathanson renounced his abortion practice in the 1970s and subsequently converted to Catholicism in 1996." -Human Life International
(Read Dr. Nathanson's powerful testimony)
WITH GOD ALL THINGS ARE POSSIBLE.











